Again Does It Need a Comma

In the early on 1990s, at school in Oxford, England, my English teacher tried to teach united states how to use commas. I remember it so well because of the feeling of utter bamboozlement that overcame me. In an endeavor to simplify the complex rules of comma placement, my instructor used the rough-and-ready dominion of "you should use a comma where you would pause in speaking". In retrospect, I think this just confused me more. I'k sure many people have felt the same way.

Commas are ane of the well-nigh frustrating grammatical concepts, fifty-fifty for native English speakers. Nonetheless, in that location are specific rules for when you lot should and shouldn't utilize commas. Edifice our grammar checker we've identified 26 places where you might need a comma. In this commodity, I will explain all of these places along with examples of how to use commas in English sentences. Only bookmark this article in example y'all always become confused by a comma again.

You'll see lots of articles named things similar "13 Rules for Using Commas" or "eight Elementary Comma Rules". The reality is that there are many more rules for using commas. Don't despair though. Dissimilar many rules in English, they actually make sense, every bit they are designed to help avoid confusion. Missing commas can take a HUGE bear on on the meaning of your sentence. Missing commas can even cost a 1000000 dollars.

To produce this list, our squad of linguists analyzed thousands of sentences and classified every comma in each judgement according to its employ. They also found MANY mistakes every bit well. Nosotros used all of this information to build our list and to train the automated comma checker in our free grammar checker. All the information below is built into our grammar checker and so that every fourth dimension you make a mistake y'all can see why.

Then, where do commas go in a sentence? This is the definitive list:

  • Before a coordinating conjunction when it separates two independent clauses.

  • Before "then" when it separates two contained clauses.

  • Earlier a analogous conjunction when information technology separates an contained and dependent clause as an Oxford comma.

  • Afterwards an initial/introductory adverb that modifies a whole judgement or independent clause.

  • Subsequently a time phrase that comes before a judgement or contained clause.

  • Later a subordinate clause—ane that starts with a subordinating conjunction.

  • Before a subordinate clause—in some specific cases.

  • Between two adjectives when they both modify the noun—coordinate adjectives.

  • After an introductory prepositional phrase.

  • Before and later on a participle phrase.

  • When a discussion is omitted intentionally for stylistic reasons.

  • Afterward an adverbial infinitive phrase.

  • At the end of a quotation, before the closing quotation marking.

  • Before an opening quotation mark.

  • To set off contrasting phrases.

  • Before an appositive.

  • After an appositive.

  • Before "which" in nonrestrictive phrases.

  • To split list items.

  • To separate out a parenthetical chemical element of a sentence.

  • To separate city and land/metropolis and state.

  • To set off a vocative.

  • To separate the 24-hour interval from the month, and the appointment from the year.

  • Before and subsequently "too."

  • In numbers as a separator.

  • Before and after "please."

That'south a long listing, and it requires some knowledge of grammatical terminology to process it. And then let's look at specific questions and examples of comma usage.

Is it grammatically correct to put a comma before "and"?

It is grammatically correct to utilize a comma before "and" (and other coordinating conjunctions such as "merely", "or", "nor") simply when it splits 2 independent clauses (i.eastward. if y'all remove the "and" yous will be left with 2 complete sentences), or if you're using it every bit an Oxford comma.

There are iii ways that "and" tin exist used in a judgement: - To split up two contained clauses, i.e. yous should be able to remove the "and" and be left with two consummate sentences. - To dissever two dependent clauses, i.due east. if you took the "and" away so you wouldn't have two sentences. - To separate items in a list, e.yard. buckets and spades, or lions and tigers and bears. A comma is used before an "and" only if it is used to separate two independent clauses, or if information technology is used equally an Oxford comma to dissever the last item in a list of 3 or more things.

Correct: He is great, and I admire him.

In this instance there are 2 independent clauses every bit I could write: "He is slap-up." and "I adore him."

If both the independent clauses are short and then some writers may choose to omit the comma earlier the "and", but yous will never exist wrong to employ it. And then if you're not sure and then I advise you to include information technology.

If I wrote instead: "He is swell and works hard," this is an independent clause and a dependent clause, because "works hard" is not a consummate sentence.

Correct: He is great and works hard. Incorrect: He is corking, and works hard.

ProWritingAid

In some circumstances, y'all may use a comma before a conjunction such as "and" when it starts a dependent clause. This is when you lot are using the comma every bit an Oxford comma (sometimes known as a serial comma). The conjunction must dissever the third item of a listing. eastward.g. I ate, slept, and dreamed of England.

Read more about using an Oxford comma.

Correct: He ate dinner, slept all night, and awoke refreshed. (as an Oxford comma) Incorrect: He ate dinner, and awoke refreshed. (not an Oxford comma)

Is it grammatically correct to put a comma earlier "then"?

The discussion "then" can office as several parts of spoken communication. For comma usage, the most important usage is as a conjunction. In theory, "then" is not a coordinating conjunction (like "and", "or"), simply sometimes information technology is used as such.

Example: I went to bed, so I started dreaming.

Here, "then" is used as a shortened form of "and so". Some people might strongly disagree with this sort of sentence, merely the truth is that it is widely used, even by The New York Times.

You can read more in this article.

We recommend that where "so" tin exist replaced by "and then" you use the aforementioned rules for comma placement as adding a comma before an "and", i.e. add together one if the post-obit phrase is an independent clause.

Should I apply a comma subsequently an introductory adverb like "apparently"?

Adverbs are words that modify verbs or fifty-fifty whole sentences. They oft end in "-ly". Examples include "quickly", "ofttimes", "slowly". You can meet that they "add" some information to a "verb" or the sentence that they are modifying. Some adverbs don't end "-ly", due east.1000. "sometimes" or "often".

When an adverb modifies an entire sentence or independent clause that follows it then yous should use a comma after it.

Correct: Sadly, they didn't understand me.

Incorrect: Sadly they didn't understand me.

Correct: Strangely, the book hasn't arrived.

Incorrect: Strangely the book hasn't arrived.

Then when "manifestly" modifies the whole sentence or clause that follows it then it should be followed by a comma.

Right: Apparently, he doesn't have a clue.

Incorrect: Apparently he doesn't have a clue.

Should I utilise a comma after a time phrase such every bit "in the meantime"?

A time phrase is something that gives details of the fourth dimension that something happened. It might be a unmarried word or a complete phrase. Some examples of time phrases are tomorrow, at 2pm, 5 hundred years ago, and in the meantime.

When a time phrase adds information to an independent clause or judgement that follows it then it should be followed by a comma. If the phrase or judgement comes earlier the time phrase then it shouldn't accept a comma before it.

Correct: Five hundred years ago, there were no grammar books.

Incorrect: Five hundred years ago there were no grammar books.

Correct: There were no grammar books v hundred years ago.

Wrong: At that place were no grammar books, five hundred years ago.

Correct: Yesterday, at that place was no new news.

Wrong: Yesterday there was no new news.

Correct: There was no new news yesterday.

Incorrect: In that location was no new news, yesterday.

How should I use a comma with a subordinate clause?

Subordinate clauses are judgement fragments that outset with a subordinating conjunction (e.g. subsequently, although, equally, as if, as long every bit). They tin can't form a sentence on their own, but they add information to the main clause, usually some form of condition, e.g. if you do this, whenever you see him.

Subordinate clauses are great because they add diversity to your writing, merely frequently, writers are not sure how to employ commas with them. A missed comma after a subordinate clause is one of the most mutual mistakes that nosotros see. So how do you punctuate a subordinate clause? It turns out there is a pretty unproblematic rule:

If a subordinate clause comes earlier the clause information technology is attached to and so it should exist followed by a comma. You do non need a comma before a subordinate clause if it follows the main clause (except "whereas" and "although").

Correct: If you're fix, we tin can begin.

Correct: We can begin if y'all're set.

Incorrect: If you're set up we can begin.

Incorrect: Nosotros can begin, if y'all're ready.

Right: Although y'all're ready, we must wait.

Correct: Nosotros must expect although you're set up.

Wrong: Although you're set up nosotros must wait.

Incorrect: Nosotros must await, although yous're prepare.

Should you use a comma before "whereas" and "although"?

The words "whereas" and "although" are subordinating conjunctions. The general dominion for subordinating conjunctions states that you shouldn't use a comma before a subordinating conjunction that comes later the main clause. Still, "whereas" and "although" are examples of "adverbs of concession," along with "though" and "even though". They are used where a dependent clause is contrasting to the main clause (a bit similar "but"). Yous should utilize a comma to introduce a dependent clause that starts with an adverb of concession.

Correct: I waited at the door, whereas Katy waited in the street.

Wrong: I waited at the door whereas Katy waited in the street.

Should you lot employ a comma before "while"?

Slightly more circuitous is the question of whether you should utilize a comma before "while." While is a subordinating conjunction, merely in some circumstances it can deed as an adverb of concession as well. In these circumstances information technology should accept a comma before it.

If y'all can replace while with as, then it shouldn't have a comma earlier information technology. Information technology is just a normal subordinating conjunction. If you can supplant while with whereas and then you should use a comma before it because it is being used as an adverb of concession.

Right: The man left the eatery while [as] information technology was raining.

Incorrect: The human being left the restaurant, while [as] it was raining.

Correct: The man left the restaurant, while [whereas] his partner stayed.

Incorrect: The man left the restaurant while [whereas] his partner stayed.

Should yous have a comma before "because"?

In most circumstances, "because" is a subordinating conjunction, so when information technology starts a dependent clause afterwards the main clause, it shoudn't be preceded by a comma. However, in that location are two exceptions to this rule:

  • when the independent clause that comes before "because" contains a negative verb (e.g. don't, couldn't, wouldn't)
  • when the independent clause that comes before "because" contains two elements and information technology is unclear which ane "considering" refers to.

Let's look at an example of when the independent clause that comes before "because" contains a negative verb:

He didn't take the go out because of the fog.

This example is confusing because you're unsure whether it was the fog that caused him to miss the leave, or some unknown factor. east.thou. He didn't take the exit because of the fog, but because he wasn't paying attention.

Where you mean that the fog didn't cause him to miss the exit it might exist best to rewrite it as: The fog didn't cause him to miss the leave. If you mean that he missed the get out because of the fog, so you lot should include a comma.

Correct: He didn't take the exit, considering of the fog.

Wrong: He didn't take the exit considering of the fog. (ambiguous)

Correct: I couldn't come up, because of the traffic.

Incorrect: I couldn't come because of the traffic. (ambiguous)

Correct: I couldn't come because of the traffic, but considering my car broke downwardly.

Correct: It wasn't the traffic that meant I couldn't come, it was because my automobile broke down.

Permit'south expect at an case of when there are two elements in the contained clause that precede "because" and the dependent clause could refer to either one.

I thought you lot sent me flowers because I saw you yesterday.

Did yous ship me flowers considering you saw me yesterday, or did I call up you sent me flowers considering I saw you yesterday and you hinted you might?

Equally a side note, these kinds of ambiguous constructions are all-time avoided. Rewrite them to exist unambiguous. Whatsoever sentence that crusade ambiguity in your readers' minds stops them agreement your message.

Should I use a comma before "for"?

In some circumstances, "for" can be replaced with "because". In that example and then it follows the rules for "because" outlined above, i.e. simply include a comma earlier "for" when the verb in the independent clause that precedes it is negated and this might crusade confusion.

Should I employ a comma before "since"?

In some circumstances, "since" tin can be replaced with "because". In that case then it follows the rules for "because" outlined higher up, i.e. only include a comma before "since" when the verb in the independent clause that precedes it is negated and this might crusade confusion.

Should I use a comma between 2 adjectives?

Adjectives are words that modify a noun like "old", "reddish", "greasy". They should really be chosen "adnouns" to exist consistent with "adverbs." Sadly, they're not, merely that's a adept way to call back of them.

Yous should use a comma betwixt 2 adjectives when they are coordinate adjectives. Coordinate adjectives are ii or more than adjectives that draw the same substantive equally.

With coordinate adjectives yous can put "and" between them and the meaning is the aforementioned. Similarly, you tin can swap their lodge.

For example: The long, metallic pole. "Long" and "metal" are both adjectives that depict the noun "pole": I could write "long pole" or "metal pole". I could also write "long and metal pole" and "metal and long pole" and "metallic, long pole". They might sound slightly strange but the meaning is retained.

Cumulative adjectives build on each other and cannot be re-ordered or split with "and," for case: bright yellowish jacket. It tin't be "bright and yellow jacket" or "yellow bright jacket".

Because coordinate adjectives are as important, they are separated by a comma. Cumulative adjectives aren't every bit important and then they are not separated by a comma. Merely use a comma to separate 2 adjectives if you could also write "and" in that location and proceed the aforementioned meaning.

Correct: The long, metal pole stuck out of the footing.

Incorrect: The long metal pole stuck out of the basis.

Correct: The bright yellow jacket looked amazing.

Incorrect: The bright, yellow jacket looked astonishing.

ProWritingAid

Do you lot always put a comma after a prepositional phrase?

An introductory prepositional phrase sets the scene for the main phrase. It is often to practise with fourth dimension or location, e.grand. In the morning or In 2018. An introductory prepositional phrase starts with a preposition (words like in, on, later on, before).

For brusk introductory phrases (fewer than four words), you can choose to add a comma or not. For longer phrases, y'all should always utilise a comma.

Short prepositional phrase:

Right: In the morning let'southward go to the zoo.

Correct: In the morn, let's get to the zoo.

Longer phrase:

Correct: On the morning of his birthday, Robbie wanted to go to the zoo.

Wrong: On the morning of his altogether Robbie wanted to go to the zoo.

Annotation: you might also detect these prepositional phrases in the middle of sentences later on a conjunction, e.g. He went to bed, and in the morning, he wanted to go to the zoo. For these, you should follow the same rules every bit if they came at the first of a sentence.

Should I use a comma with a participle or gerund phrase?

Participle phrases are phrases that modify a noun or pronoun. They add extra context. Hither are a couple of examples:

Example: Walking to the shops, he saw his cousin.

Example: Upset by his cousin, he went habitation.

Case: Frank, hoping to become promoted, applied for the part.

Example: Anne applied for the role, hoping to become promoted.

Example: Katy walked domicile, tired from a difficult day in the office.

The 2 forms of participle phrase you can run into here are:

  • Nowadays participle (always catastrophe -ing), e.1000. walking, hoping.

  • Past participles (oftentimes catastrophe -ed, merely sometimes irregular), e.g. tired, upset.

Note: sometimes participle phrases tin be bearded if at that place is an adverb on the front, e.thousand. Desperately seeking shelter, he ran into the building.

The comma rules you need to know for participle phrases are:

  • For participial phrases before the main clause, put a comma after the participial phrase.

  • For participial phrases in the middle of the sentence, the phrase requires commas both before and after it.

  • For participial phrases after the main clause, put a comma before the participial phrase.

Do I need a comma when I omit a word for stylistic reasons?

Sometimes when writing we omit words for stylistic reasons. This comma of omission is often seen when parallel structures are used, such equally two sentences taking the same form.

Case: I loved playing tennis; my blood brother [loved] volleyball.

Right: I loved playing tennis; my blood brother, volleyball.

Incorrect: I loved playing lawn tennis; my brother volleyball.

We also need to include a comma of omission when we accept removed a coordinating conjunction (ordinarily "and"). This construction is fairly rare.

Example: I opened the kick [and] saw the spare tyre.

Correct: I opened the boot, saw the spare tyre. Incorrect: I opened the boot saw the spare tyre.

Correct: Carrie mimicked his tilted head, [and] so laughed.

Wrong: Carrie mimicked his tilted head [and] then laughed.

Exercise you need a comma after an adverbial infinitive phrase?

Infinitive phrases brainstorm with an infinitive (to + the uncomplicated form of the verb), e.one thousand. to be ameliorate, to win at lawn tennis, to salvage coin.

Infinitive phrases can part in a sentence as nouns, adjectives or adverbs. From a comma perspective yous only need to worry almost ones that function as adverbs. These are often constitute at the start of a sentence, but are not the subject.

Example: To exist the best, you must do.

Example: To read more than, please subscribe to our newsletter.

When an adverbial infinitive phrase introduces a master clause then you should always follow it by a comma:

Correct: To be the all-time, you lot must practise. Incorrect: To be the all-time you must practise.

But be conscientious that the phrase is not interim as a substantive. Never put a comma after an adverbial phrase when "is" or "was" direct follows:

Right: To be the all-time is his goal.

Wrong: To be the best, is his goal.

When an adverbial infinitive phrase is plant in the middle of a sentence you should surround it with commas. In this case, it is acting as an interrupter:

Right: The suit, to be fair, suited him.

Incorrect: The suit to exist off-white suited him.

Incorrect: The adjust, to exist fair suited him.

Incorrect: The suit to be off-white, suited him.

When an adverbial infinitive phrase finishes a chief clause then yous shouldn't employ a comma before it:

Correct: The suit suited him to be off-white.

Incorrect: The suit suited him, to be fair.

Should I utilize a comma at the finish of a quotation, before the closing quotation mark?

In American English language, you should ever place a comma or flow inside quotation marks. In United kingdom usage, you can choose. Most style guides, such every bit the Mod Language Association (MLA), Associated Press (AP), and The Chicago Manual of Manner (Chicago) suggest the American rule. If y'all're uncertain who your audition will be and so it'due south best to always identify your commas within of quotes. That way you'll never been seen every bit incorrect.

Correct: "I'll come forth later," said Mary.

Wrong in US: "I'll come along later", said Mary.

Incorrect in U.s.: "I'll come along later" said Mary.

Should I use a comma earlier an opening quotation mark?

When you include quoted material or dialogue in a sentence then you should proceed it with a comma unless it fits into the menstruation of the judgement seamlessly, e.g. The President said that there is "no smoking gun" to be institute.

In these cases, the sentence would exist syntactically correct without the quotation marks, and y'all are just using the quotation marks to show that the quote is a direct quote. Often, in this scenario, the quote will be preceded by "that", e.thousand. He said that "the state volition continue to grow."

Otherwise, you lot should use a comma earlier opening quotation marks, e.m. Sandra called out, "What practise you desire from the store?"

Should I apply a comma before "which"?

To understand if y'all should employ a comma before which we need to understand the difference between a restrictive and a non-restrictive clause.

A restrictive clause is one where its removal would modify the significant of the judgement. It is necessary for understanding the significant of the sentence. In the US, many style guides suggest that you should use "that" rather than "which" for restrictive clauses, e.k. The fruit that we bought was tasty.

A non-restrictive clause does not alter the meaning of the sentence. This additional information is used with "which" and a pair of commas placed before and later on the clause:

Right: The fruit, which everyone found tasty, was my best idea.

Incorrect: The fruit which everyone institute tasty was my best idea.

Incorrect: The fruit, which anybody found tasty was my all-time idea.

Incorrect: The fruit which anybody found tasty, was my best idea.

"Which" can besides appear as function of a prepositional phrase, due east.thou. The team in which we played was great. When "which" appears in a prepositional phrase, it should not exist preceded past a comma. Other examples of which in a prepositional phrase are "on which" and "of which."

Right: The games, the longest of which lasted two hours, were fun.

Incorrect: The games, the longest of, which lasted two hours, were fun.

Correct: The situation in which we found ourselves was fun.

Incorrect: The situation in, which we constitute ourselves was fun.

Should you lot utilise a comma before "which" in an indirect question?

When y'all're using "which" at the kickoff of an indirect question, it should exist preceded past a comma.

Correct: I asked, which is the best?

Incorrect: I asked which is the best?

This is similar to the rule well-nigh using a comma before a quotation as yous can imagine the indirect question existence surrounded by quotation marks.

Should I employ a comma before and subsequently an appositive?

An appositive is a give-and-take or phrase that helps to farther place a substantive. Often the appositive tin can be swapped with the noun it helps describe.

Instance 1: Manuel Picon, the quondam French President, visited the Britain yesterday.

Example 2: The former French President Manuel Picon visited the United kingdom yesterday.

Notice that in the showtime example, nosotros use commas around the appositive, but in the 2nd example we don't. That's the play a joke on here. If the appositive is essential to the meaning of the phrase so we don't have commas, i.e. in Example ii if we remove "Manuel Picon" we don't know which former French President we're talking about. In Example i, we know exactly who visited the Great britain, then we add commas around the appositive because it is non-essential.

In some cases it can be tricky to decide. For instance, if I say: My sister, Mary, will come then I may or may not use commas depending on the context. If I have several sisters and information technology is unclear which i will come without the appositive then I should non utilize commas. If I have only one sister then I should utilize commas. Just consider whether the meaning is unclear if the appositive is removed and if it is so don't use commas.

Should I use a comma before "not"?

Commas are oft used to set off a contrasting element in a sentence. These contrasting elements frequently starting time with "not": due east.yard. He chose the dark-green, not the ruby., It happened at dark, not during the twenty-four hour period.

When not starts a contrasting phrase then you lot should keep information technology with a comma.

Non tin too exist used every bit a simple describing word. In this case, you wouldn't apply a comma before not: e.g. He is not happy., She is non going to come.

Should I use a comma before "yet"?

Yet can be used to get-go a contrasting element in a sentence, eastward.g. She was sad, yet relieved.

When yet is used to prepare off a contrasting element of a sentence then it should have a comma before it, just similar with not.

Other examples of contrastive elements that should be preceded with a comma are:

You're coming, aren't you lot?

The statue seemed different, almost alive.

The pol seemed stupid, possibly even moronic.

This final example shows that sometimes contrasting elements can be disguised with an adverb earlier them. And then sometimes you lot might take to await at the second give-and-take of a contrasting element to determine whether or not information technology needs to be proceeded with a comma.

Practice I need to use a comma with list items?

When we take a list of iii or more than items, we use a comma to split up the items in the list. This comma is known every bit a listing comma, e.g. I similar rice, beans, and plantains. Listing commas tin can usually be replaced by "and" or "or," e.g. I like rice and beans and plantains.

Listing commas can carve up lists of nouns, verbs, adjectives, dependent clauses, or even complete sentences. This can hateful that yous can have a comma before an "and" that is followed past a dependent clause if it is the last item in a list of dependent clauses. Some authors like to join sentences with listing commas, east.g. I came in, I saw the package, and I opened it.

When using listing commas, the comma before the final "and" or "or" is optional depending on if you lot are using Oxford commas or not. How to utilize an Oxford (or serial) comma.

How do I utilize commas with parenthetical elements?

A parenthetical chemical element is an element of a sentence that is added but is not essential to the meaning of the sentence. It adds colour to the sentence, e.g. Of all the chilli sauces I've tried, and I've tried a lot, this is my favourite. or Some people, who I won't name, wouldn't like this.

Normally a parenthetical element has a comma before and later on information technology. Instead, you might choose to utilize brackets or dashes to separate a parenthetical element from the remainder of the judgement.

Here are some examples of parenthetical items used correctly with commas:

  • Maria, although she comes from Spain, hates paella.

  • This is, in my opinion, the almost important issue.

  • The biggest event, as you volition see, is where we will store all the actress components.

  • The holidays in Spain, of which at that place are many, are generally religious.

Interjections such as "yes" and "no" are generally treated equally parenthetical elements. When they come at the start of a sentence, they should be followed by a comma. When they come at the end of a sentence, they should exist preceded past a comma.

Should I use a comma between a metropolis and a country/a metropolis and a country?

In geographical names with ii or more elements, you should apply a comma subsequently each unlike chemical element. This helps the reader to meet the dissimilar component parts of the address. You lot should too use a comma later on the last item in the name unless it comes at the cease of the judgement in which case you should utilise a period (or question mark if it is a question). e.1000. Is Oxford, England, total of clever people?

The main times when geographical names are composed of two or more entities are:

  • between a hamlet/boondocks/city and a land, e.yard. I live in Miami, Florida.

  • between a village/town/city and a country, e.m. I live in Liverpool, England.

  • betwixt a canton and a state, due east.k. I live in Cook Canton, Illinois.

  • between a county and a country, due east.one thousand. I live in Cornwall, England.

  • between a village/town/city and a region, e.g. I alive in Garsington, Oxfordshire.

  • between a region and a country, due east.g. I live in Tabasco, Mexico.

A archetype example would be if y'all used an address in a piece of text, e.1000. Eric Wimp, living at 29 Acacia Road, Nuttytown, eats a banana to transform into Bananaman.

The parts of an address should exist separated by commas and information technology should be followed by a comma unless information technology appears at the end of a sentence.

ProWritingAid

Should I use a comma before and afterwards vocative?

A vocative is when you utilise accost someone by name, eastward.grand. Pass the salt, Mary. or Are you a prince, Harry? or Meg, are you there?

Vocatives are usually found at the beginning or the end of a sentence, only they can be included in the eye of a judgement, e.g. What, Harry, is your title?

Vocatives should e'er be used with commas. Here are the three rules for using commas with vocatives:

  • use a comma after a vocative at the start of the sentence.

  • use a comma before a vocative at the cease of the sentence.

  • use a comma before and after a vocative in the middle of the sentence.

Correct: What is that, Frank?

Incorrect: What is that Frank?

Correct: Frank, what is that?

Incorrect: Frank what is that?

Correct: What, Frank, is that?

Incorrect: What Frank is that?

Incorrect: What, Frank is that?

Incorrect: What Frank, is that?

In some cases you might non use someone's proper name to refer to them, but a title, or other description. Some examples of this are: sir, madam, boy, darling, sweetheart, pal, gentlemen, folks. e.g. It'south great to see you here today, folks.

When using a vocative in the center of a sentence, make sure that you're not really creating a comma splice past joining 2 independent clauses.

Correct: This is great, Joe. I love it.

Incorrect: This is great, Joe, I love it.

Correct: We dearest it, Louise. We'll apply information technology.

Incorrect: We love it, Louise, we'll apply it.

Do you need a comma to separate the day from the month, and the date from the twelvemonth?

When you write a date, you lot should utilize a comma to separate the day from the month, and the appointment from the year, e.g. He was born on October viii, 1977. or Today is Tuesday, Baronial 8, 2019.

Correct: I was born on Saturday, Oct 8, 1977.

Wrong: I was built-in on Sat Oct eight, 1977.

Incorrect: I was built-in on Saturday October 8 1977.

Wrong: I was born on Sat, Oct 8 1977.

If you put the day of the month first, east.k. 12 May 2012, then there is no need to include commas in the appointment.

Do you need a comma before or after "besides"?

Too is an adverb. It's usually used to hateful "in addition" or "likewise." I would say that "likewise" is one of the hardest words to know whether you should use a comma or non. It really depends and many editors will have contradictory views. On the other mitt, you could say that's great news as y'all'll never be wrong. If you want to emphasize the "too" so use a comma, but if it's non that important and then you can get away with leaving them out.

If "as well" comes in the eye of a judgement so you should either take ii commas or no commas. If y'all only have a single comma before or afterwards then that's definitely wrong.

Right: I, too, like being with you. (accent)

Right: I too like existence with you lot. (no emphasis)

Incorrect: I too, like being with y'all.

Incorrect: I, too like existence with you.

Correct: I like you, likewise. (emphasis)

Right: I like you lot as well. (no accent)

When should I employ a comma to separate numbers?

In English, we use commas in numbers greater than 999 to split the number and make it clearer. We use a comma every third digit from the correct.

Incorrect: More than 50000 people turned upwards to protestation. Correct: More than than 50,000 people turned up to protest.

Notation how much easier information technology is to read. The comma every third digit is sometimes known as a "thousands-separator." Brand sure you don't include a infinite on either side of this comma.

Correct: Nosotros will walk x,000 miles.

Incorrect: We volition walk x, 000 miles.

Incorrect: We will walk ten , 000 miles.

Wrong: We volition walk 10 ,000 miles.

When a number uses a decimal betoken, we never identify commas to the right of the decimal signal. Some people like to employ sparse spaces going from left to right instead.

Correct: The value of Pi is three.14159 to five decimal places.

Correct: The value of Pi is 3.14 159 to five decimal places.

Incorrect: The value of Pi is 3.141,59 to five decimal places.

Incorrect: The value of Pi is 3.xiv,159 to 5 decimal places.

Numbers that are not amounts, such every bit phone numbers, business firm numbers, and years do not usually have commas inside them.

It can get confusing as many other countries (such as Spain) use commas in numbers instead of a decimal indicate, e.grand. 100,01 instead of 100.01. In these cases, you lot might see a period used instead of commas or a space, e.one thousand. 1.000,01 or 1 000,01 instead of 1,000.01.

Should I use a comma before or after "please" in a judgement?

If please comes at the finish of a judgement and then yous should almost always apply a comma before it. The but exception is when y'all are not using it to inquire nicely, just as part of the sentence, east.1000. You tin can do every bit y'all please.

Right: Can y'all help, please?

Incorrect: Can y'all assistance delight?

Correct: Exercise as yous please.

Incorrect: Practise as you lot, please.

When please is used at the offset of a sentence then you can cull to use a comma depending on if you'd like to emphasize it.

Right: Delight, can you help? (accent)

Correct: Delight can you help? (no emphasis)

Please can appear in the middle of a sentence. This is quite unusual. It might appear as:

  • part of a phrase no commas needed, e.grand. Don't forget to say delight and thank y'all.
  • as a verb with no commas needed, east.one thousand. He wants to please the states.
  • afterwards a conjunction or at the start of a clause where you should use a comma after it if you want to emphasize it, e.grand. Y'all can become, but please, exist careful. or If you go, delight be careful.

When is a comma unnecessary?

Many people use a comma where they would pause naturally in a sentence. While this uncomplicated flim-flam oftentimes works, yous oft cease up calculation a comma where it is non necessary. Adding unnecessary commas into a sentence tin clutter it and brand it less readable. Here is some more specific guidance on when you don't need to use a comma:

Should you lot follow an introductory phrase with a comma?

When should you lot utilize a comma before a coordinating conjunction?

Practise I need a comma after a subordinate clause?

Do I need a comma after a participle phrase?

To avert using unnecessary commas, brand sure that you lot are familiar with all the rules in this article.

Have nosotros missed anything? We've tried to build an exhaustive list of every possible instance where you might need a comma. Delight allow united states of america know if you tin think of anything else.

Please link to this resources from your blog or web page so we tin can aid as many people as possible understand commas.

simmonsharanded99.blogspot.com

Source: https://prowritingaid.com/Comma

0 Response to "Again Does It Need a Comma"

Enviar um comentário

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel